Dugg is a Clown

 

2007/12/23

Tim Russert Exposes Obvious Ron Paul Whining Lies

@ 03:04 PM (23 months, 10 days ago)

 

MR. RUSSERT:  If you were true to your philosophy, you would say no pork spending in my district.

REP. PAUL:  No, no, that's not it.  They steal our money, that's like saying that people shouldn't take Social Security money.

MR. RUSSERT:  For...

REP. PAUL:  I don't advocate that.

MR. RUSSERT:  All right, let me ask you this...

REP. PAUL:  I'm trying to save the system, make the system work.

MR. RUSSERT:  Let me ask you this...

REP. PAUL:  But no, I think you have it all mixed up.  Now, you're confused.

MR. RUSSERT:  All right.  It's all facts.

REP. PAUL:  You're confused.

MR. RUSSERT:  This is The Wall Street Journal.  You load up the bills with special projects...

REP. PAUL:  I--no, no, no.  No, you don't.

MR. RUSSERT:  You do.  You do.  You deny that you have, you have...

REP. PAUL:  How many of them ever got passed?  But the whole point is, we have a right and an...

MR. RUSSERT:  They pass.  You vote against them, but you take the money.

REP. PAUL:  You don't quite understand.

MR. RUSSERT:  OK.

REP. PAUL:  They take our money from us, and the Congress has the authority to appropriate, not the executive branch.  And I'm saying that I represent my people.  They have a request, it's like taking a tax credit, and I put it in--the whole process is corrupt so that I vote against everything.

MR. RUSSERT:  All right, let me ask you this.  But if...

REP. PAUL:  I vote against it, so I don't endorse the system.

MR. RUSSERT:  But when it passes overwhelmingly, you take the money back home.

REP. PAUL:  I don't take it.  That's the system.

MR. RUSSERT:  The system.

REP. PAUL:  I'm trying to change that system.  To turn it around and say I'm supporting this system, I find it...

MR. RUSSERT:  Well.  Well...

REP. PAUL:  ...rather ironic and entertaining.

MR. RUSSERT:  Well, when you stop taking earmarks or putting earmarks in the, in the spending bills, then I think you'll be consistent.

 

Ron Paul is a fraud.  He's a sneaky spin doctor.

 

Comment(s) »

  1. That's the worst thing they can come up with and I think he answered it pretty logically.

    Comment by Dugg— 2007/12/23 @ 10:15 PM — (Reply)

  2. Russert was biased and treated Paul differently than anyone who's ever been on his show.

    Comment by Dugg— 2007/12/23 @ 10:16 PM — (Reply)

  3. Logically? Just what did he say?

    Comment by Elmers Brother— 2007/12/23 @ 10:17 PM — (Reply)

  4. Paul is saying that he won't turn down earmarks for his constituents while voting no when he knows his vote won't matter and saying earmarks are bad. Total BS.

    Paul knows he would not have been re-elected if he had acted on what he now claims are his "principals".

    Russert nailed him.

    Comment by DUGG— 2007/12/23 @ 10:25 PM — (Reply)

» Leave a comment


:mrgreen: :neutral: :twisted: :arrow: :shock: :smile: :???: :cool: :evil: :grin: :idea: :oops: :razz: :roll: :wink: :cry: :eek: :lol: :mad: :sad: :!: :?:

Preview:

You say:

To prevent spam, please type in the exact word you see in this image: CAPTCHA
To refresh the image, click here. Otherwise, contact us.

  • Your E-mail address is never displayed. If you enter it, it will only be visible to the blog author
  • Since there already are comments to this post, your eventual comment might trigger a notification e-mail to the persons that commented before you.
  • The line and paragraph breaks automatically